Posts Tagged ‘billing’

Thoughts on the RBMA 2010 A/R 2010 Accounts Receivable Performance Survey

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

There is a scene in the Steve Martin movie “The Jerk” where he runs around yelling excitedly, “The new phone books are here. The new phone books are here.” I felt like that the other day when the new RBMA A/R 2010 Accounts Receivable Survey arrived in the mail. In my nerdy excitement, I couldn’t wait to see what was inside though I suppressed the urge to scream to the world it was here.

For those of you unfamiliar with the RBMA’s Accounts Receivable survey, it is a compilation of surveys of financial data of radiology groups in the US. It is an extremely valuable for benchmarking your own practice with that of other groups.

Most of us track our own metrics from month to month, but those metrics take on a whole new meaning when we get to compare them to our peers and see the trending in the market as a whole.

The survey is copyrighted and rightly so. It has a great value. So I’d like to make a few observations without infringing on the RBMA’s copyright. I’d encourage you to acquire one of the surveys from the RBMA if you don’t have one already.

As you would expect, Adjusted Collection Percentage is trending downward. This metric tells us the percentage of the money that we are collecting versus what is possible to collect. This makes sense. We have a rising percentage of patient responsibility for payment. We have rising deductibles (converting many “insured” patients into de facto self pay patients). We have rising immigration and unemployment. From this, we intuitively understand that it is going to be harder to collect on that money even though it is money that is possible to collect.

The best thing about the new RMBA Accounts Receivable is the addition of patient mix. This key metric was omitted in previous surveys; therefore we don’t have any way to measure the change in patient mix. However, this should be very interesting to watch in the next few years.

Days in AR is trending downward meaning that people are collecting their money faster than in past years. I wouldn’t put too much stock in this although I would tell you this metric is the darling of some billing entities. I’m not a big fan of this metric except internal to your organization as it is simply too easy to be manipulated. I’ve seen operations where Days in AR looks fabulous, except when you dig under the numbers the billing entity is just writing things off at some arbitrary age. I am of the school that things should be written off after they have been properly and thoroughly worked regardless of the age. If we are taking too long to work it, fix it. Don’t play to the metric; use the metric to improve your business practices. Sloppiness in this area can be discovered with unusually high Total Write-offs as a Percentage of Gross Charges, below average Adjusted Collection Percentage and a high Bad Debt Recovery as a Percentage of Collection Agency Write-offs. I would add, though, that this number could be falling because of the advances in billing technology by such companies as IMAGINEradiology and computer-assisted coding.

Billing/Collection Expense Percentage is the amount that it costs you to run your billing operation. The Billing/Collection Expense Percentage is rising for some and falling for others so that a trend is not readily discernable. The RBMA breaks it out for in-house and outsourcing. Of the two, I would tend to trust the outsourcing figure better. Outsourcing tends to be a fee which is easily accounted for while in-house billing can have a lot of variables in shared costs. For example, you might have an administrator who handles more than just billing. How does their cost get allocated?

The RBMA AR Report doesn’t report the most vital financial number of all for radiology groups and that is money in the bank. Most radiologists aren’t that familiar with how efficiently their money is being collected, but most know if they are making more or less money. In this day of declining reimbursements and worsening patient mixes, the day may be coming soon when things like Adjusted Collection Percentage and the RBMA AR Survey will hit the radar of the average radiologist. They will want to know just how efficiently and how effectively their billing company or in-house staff is. Until then, it will be up to geeks like me to getting excited about these things.

If you want to know more about what these exciting terms mean to you and your practice, I would suggest my white paper entitled What Every Radiologist Should Know about Medical Billing. It will tell you how to make sense of your RBMA Accounts Receivable report. It is available for free at www.dexioscorp.com.

Stop Annoying Business Practices

Friday, August 6th, 2010

I have always been an ardent observer of people. I love to watch people in amusement parks, for example. People wear some crazy things. People do some crazy things.

When it comes to business, people do some crazy things too. For example, I have an account with a water company to provide our offices with drinking water. This week I received a notice from them that my credit card transaction didn’t go through. They wanted me to fill out a new form and pay them a $15 service fee. I checked with the credit card company and figured out what was wrong and called the water company to inform them that the card would go through fine now. They processed the amount and it went through without a problem. Since the problem was not my fault, I asked them to remove the $15 fee. They refused.

Here is the point that I want to make. When faced with their refusal to reverse the $15 fee, I asked them to close my account. The young lady on the other end of the phone said the most amazing thing. She said incredulously “you are going to close your account over $15?” I almost laughed in her face. What a stupid comment! Yes, I am willing to lose a vendor over $15, but they are willing to give up a faithful customer who has used them for years over $15.

I bring this up because the water business and the radiology business are not that different. Do we lose patients and clients because of annoying little business practices? Are we running our businesses with inefficiencies built into the system that aggravate people? In this day and age with declining reimbursements and strong competition, can we afford to run our businesses with such foolish shortsightedness as the customer service rep for the water company? I would suggest we can’t. If we do, before too long, someone is going to come in a shut us down. It’s inevitable.

The lesson? Look at all of your business processes today and see if there are built in inefficiencies or annoyances. Try and look at things the way your customers and patients will see them. If you want, Dexios will be glad to look at your billing process. There’s a 50% chance that yours is below average (sorry, but that’s just the way statistics work). If there isn’t a problem, great! If there is a problem, at least you will know and will have the option to fix it.

Four Big Mistakes Radiologists Make with Their Billing

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

I’ve been in radiology billing in since the 1990s. I’ve also worked with a lot of small and medium sized groups that don’t have practice managers that look out for this sort of thing for them. Here is a list of the top 4 things I think that radiologists do that cost them money regarding their billing staff regardless of whether they are using a billing company or whether they are billing in house.

#1 – Radiologists are not measuring performance.

I was talking to a solo practitioner radiologist the other day and ask him what his adjusted collection percentage was. His reply was “9%.” He was obviously referring to the fee he was paying his billing company. When I explained in more detailed what I was asking him, he said he didn’t know that answer. Not good.

This is not uncommon. I talk to radiologists every day who have no idea if their billing staff is performing well or not whether they are in-house or outsourced. There is a Russian proverb I love to quote that says “There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding out.”

I told one radiologist recently (the “9%” doc) that you can’t qualitatively evaluate something you aren’t qualitatively measuring and monitoring. If you want to understand the basics on how to evaluate your practice, you can download my white paper “What Every Radiologist Should Know About Medical Billing.” See http://www.dexioscorp.com/radiology_billing_contact.html#RadiologyBilling

#2 – Radiologists are measuring something irrelevant (or don’t understand what they are measuring).

I meet radiologists all the time who focus on one or two metrics that either they don’t understand or are misleading them. They think that they are on top of things, but the ship is sinking. For example, I know some docs who think that Days in AR is a key, standalone metric. In my humble but highly accurate opinion, Days in AR is virtually worthless outside the context of Adjusted Collection Percentage, Bad Debt Recovery as a Percentage of Collection Agency Write-Offs and AR Aging Percentage Over 120 Days to name a few. You want to have a great Days in AR number, just write everything off and send it to collections after 25 days. You will collect a lot less money doing things that way, but boy your Days in AR will look super.

I think Net (or Adjusted) Collection Percentage is a “must know” and the most obvious one is money in the bank. The rest are helpful but can be misleading – especially if you don’t understand what they are telling you.

A great way to learn about these metrics as well as compare you to the rest of the world is the RBMA’s annual Accounts Receivable Report. In fact, you don’t even have to purchase it just to get the definitions. They can be found at http://www.rbma.org/Data_and_Surveys/Reference_Materials/Accounts_Receivable_Definitions_and_Formulas.aspx. The AR Report won’t tell you everything you need to know. A lot is predicated on your patient mix. However, it will explain the metrics and give you some data by which to compare yourself and see if you are above, below or at the median. You will at least have an inkling whether you need to dig deeper or not.

#3 – Radiologists get end of month reports that aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

The average billing company provides pathetic reporting. I get sent these reports by radiologists who want me to evaluate their practice. These reports are so bad that I have a difficult time figuring out what is going on…and this is what I do every day.

I know one billing company that regularly provides over 100 pages per month in reporting. Who has the time or the energy to wade through all that stuff? In fact, let me suggest that this may be one of the strategies of the billing companies—bury them in BS. The RBMA came out with a 13 month standard report a while back with all the key metrics. This one piece of paper tells you all you need to know including key ratios. As long as you know what these key ratios and line items actually mean, you have a beautiful snapshot right there.

If you don’t know how to make heads or tails out of your end of month reporting, tell your billing company what you would like to see. If you don’t know what you need, give me a call. I’ll send you a sample of the RBMA report and even walk you through what the different things mean on the report and why they are important.

#4 – Radiologists focus too much on the billing fee.

Now, as the owner of a billing company, of course I don’t want groups to focus on the fee. But seriously, the fee is equal to one percentage point of net collections. If you go with a billing company that drops your fee by one point but loses you five points in net collections you are out a lot of money.

Case in point, one of my clients pays me one point more in fee than they paid their last billing company. However, we were able to raise their net collections six points, so they netted five points to the positive. Pretty shrewd business arrangement, I’d say. For the record, if there is anyone out there who I can give $1 to and they give me back $6, I am OK with that arrangement all day and all night.

The key is finding out who can bring home the bacon. How do you do that? References are a good start. Ask references what their net collection percentage was before the current billing company took over and what it is after. Another thing is ask them to guarantee their improved collections. My company guarantees we will improve collections in the first year or we will pay $10,000. At least you know we are serious and not just blowing smoke.

Coding Audits Thoughts for the Audit-Haters

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

The word “audit” has a strong negative connotation, doesn’t it? Who wants to be audited? Visions of the IRS invading our home or business and fining the stuffing out of us come to mind. We also associate audits with the following:

• Disruption to normal work flow and processes
• Punishment and judgment
• Being nitpicked
• Being “found out” whether it be incompetence, criminal intent or a simple mistake

Even though coding audits are very helpful and, I would contend, necessary, it is often hard to sell them to your staff, doctors and even management. When it comes to medical coding audits, even very competent, ethical and meticulous coders can associate audits with reprimands, questioning their ability or ethics or even potential job loss. Doctors can grow cold on audits if they think it means that they have to change. Administrators can stress over audits as just one more think they have to do.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

First, let’s talk about the benefits of doing a coding audit and then we can delve into how to sell it.

The benefits of coding audits are straightforward.

1. If you are not coding correctly for Medicare and Medicaid, you could be liable for large monetary penalties and even jail time. The stakes are high. One rad group paid a $7 million dollar settlement. You can avoid this with an audit.
2. You could be leaving money on the table. One coding expert and auditor, Stacie Buck with RadRX (www.radrx.com), estimates that in her experience of doing audits, 40% of interventional and 10%-20% of diagnostic procedures are coded incorrectly. She added that most of the time she finds more money for clients than loses money.
3. If you are getting denials due to incorrect coding, it can increase your cash flow by coding it correctly the first time.

So assuming you think it is a good idea, here are some ways you can sell it to your billers, doctors or administrators.

1. Stress the positive. Stress that it can help us make more money while doing a better job for our providers, payers and patients. Stress that it is preventative so that problems are caught early before they become serious.
2. Start small. Many auditors like Stacie Buck offer small mini-audits. Some of these audits can be nearly painless and are often free. If you see problems in a small sample, you probably have problems in a large sample. If you don’t see any issues, you may want to wait a while and do another small, sample audit. These small audits are less disruptive and less intimidating.
3. Get people used to auditing by doing both internal as well as external audits. If people are used to being audited internally, it won’t come as such a shock when an external audit occurs. Most experts will recommend an external audit of at least once per year.

Good luck with your audits and remember, as Stacie Buck is oft saying, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

Radiology Business

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

This is a blog about the radiology business. I think that needs to be stated up front.

As the owner of two radiology-centered businesses, I spend a lot of time talking to people in the profession from practice managers to owners of companies who provide products and services to the radiology. They always have insights about the business of radiology — the proverbial insiders scoop. So why not share the wealth?

My intent is to cover a wide array of radiology business topics from RIS/PACS to billing issues to mergers to trade shows. We’ll see where it takes us.