Posts Tagged ‘rbma’

Thoughts on the RBMA 2010 A/R 2010 Accounts Receivable Performance Survey

Thursday, October 14th, 2010

There is a scene in the Steve Martin movie “The Jerk” where he runs around yelling excitedly, “The new phone books are here. The new phone books are here.” I felt like that the other day when the new RBMA A/R 2010 Accounts Receivable Survey arrived in the mail. In my nerdy excitement, I couldn’t wait to see what was inside though I suppressed the urge to scream to the world it was here.

For those of you unfamiliar with the RBMA’s Accounts Receivable survey, it is a compilation of surveys of financial data of radiology groups in the US. It is an extremely valuable for benchmarking your own practice with that of other groups.

Most of us track our own metrics from month to month, but those metrics take on a whole new meaning when we get to compare them to our peers and see the trending in the market as a whole.

The survey is copyrighted and rightly so. It has a great value. So I’d like to make a few observations without infringing on the RBMA’s copyright. I’d encourage you to acquire one of the surveys from the RBMA if you don’t have one already.

As you would expect, Adjusted Collection Percentage is trending downward. This metric tells us the percentage of the money that we are collecting versus what is possible to collect. This makes sense. We have a rising percentage of patient responsibility for payment. We have rising deductibles (converting many “insured” patients into de facto self pay patients). We have rising immigration and unemployment. From this, we intuitively understand that it is going to be harder to collect on that money even though it is money that is possible to collect.

The best thing about the new RMBA Accounts Receivable is the addition of patient mix. This key metric was omitted in previous surveys; therefore we don’t have any way to measure the change in patient mix. However, this should be very interesting to watch in the next few years.

Days in AR is trending downward meaning that people are collecting their money faster than in past years. I wouldn’t put too much stock in this although I would tell you this metric is the darling of some billing entities. I’m not a big fan of this metric except internal to your organization as it is simply too easy to be manipulated. I’ve seen operations where Days in AR looks fabulous, except when you dig under the numbers the billing entity is just writing things off at some arbitrary age. I am of the school that things should be written off after they have been properly and thoroughly worked regardless of the age. If we are taking too long to work it, fix it. Don’t play to the metric; use the metric to improve your business practices. Sloppiness in this area can be discovered with unusually high Total Write-offs as a Percentage of Gross Charges, below average Adjusted Collection Percentage and a high Bad Debt Recovery as a Percentage of Collection Agency Write-offs. I would add, though, that this number could be falling because of the advances in billing technology by such companies as IMAGINEradiology and computer-assisted coding.

Billing/Collection Expense Percentage is the amount that it costs you to run your billing operation. The Billing/Collection Expense Percentage is rising for some and falling for others so that a trend is not readily discernable. The RBMA breaks it out for in-house and outsourcing. Of the two, I would tend to trust the outsourcing figure better. Outsourcing tends to be a fee which is easily accounted for while in-house billing can have a lot of variables in shared costs. For example, you might have an administrator who handles more than just billing. How does their cost get allocated?

The RBMA AR Report doesn’t report the most vital financial number of all for radiology groups and that is money in the bank. Most radiologists aren’t that familiar with how efficiently their money is being collected, but most know if they are making more or less money. In this day of declining reimbursements and worsening patient mixes, the day may be coming soon when things like Adjusted Collection Percentage and the RBMA AR Survey will hit the radar of the average radiologist. They will want to know just how efficiently and how effectively their billing company or in-house staff is. Until then, it will be up to geeks like me to getting excited about these things.

If you want to know more about what these exciting terms mean to you and your practice, I would suggest my white paper entitled What Every Radiologist Should Know about Medical Billing. It will tell you how to make sense of your RBMA Accounts Receivable report. It is available for free at www.dexioscorp.com.

Four Big Mistakes Radiologists Make with Their Billing

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

I’ve been in radiology billing in since the 1990s. I’ve also worked with a lot of small and medium sized groups that don’t have practice managers that look out for this sort of thing for them. Here is a list of the top 4 things I think that radiologists do that cost them money regarding their billing staff regardless of whether they are using a billing company or whether they are billing in house.

#1 – Radiologists are not measuring performance.

I was talking to a solo practitioner radiologist the other day and ask him what his adjusted collection percentage was. His reply was “9%.” He was obviously referring to the fee he was paying his billing company. When I explained in more detailed what I was asking him, he said he didn’t know that answer. Not good.

This is not uncommon. I talk to radiologists every day who have no idea if their billing staff is performing well or not whether they are in-house or outsourced. There is a Russian proverb I love to quote that says “There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding out.”

I told one radiologist recently (the “9%” doc) that you can’t qualitatively evaluate something you aren’t qualitatively measuring and monitoring. If you want to understand the basics on how to evaluate your practice, you can download my white paper “What Every Radiologist Should Know About Medical Billing.” See http://www.dexioscorp.com/radiology_billing_contact.html#RadiologyBilling

#2 – Radiologists are measuring something irrelevant (or don’t understand what they are measuring).

I meet radiologists all the time who focus on one or two metrics that either they don’t understand or are misleading them. They think that they are on top of things, but the ship is sinking. For example, I know some docs who think that Days in AR is a key, standalone metric. In my humble but highly accurate opinion, Days in AR is virtually worthless outside the context of Adjusted Collection Percentage, Bad Debt Recovery as a Percentage of Collection Agency Write-Offs and AR Aging Percentage Over 120 Days to name a few. You want to have a great Days in AR number, just write everything off and send it to collections after 25 days. You will collect a lot less money doing things that way, but boy your Days in AR will look super.

I think Net (or Adjusted) Collection Percentage is a “must know” and the most obvious one is money in the bank. The rest are helpful but can be misleading – especially if you don’t understand what they are telling you.

A great way to learn about these metrics as well as compare you to the rest of the world is the RBMA’s annual Accounts Receivable Report. In fact, you don’t even have to purchase it just to get the definitions. They can be found at http://www.rbma.org/Data_and_Surveys/Reference_Materials/Accounts_Receivable_Definitions_and_Formulas.aspx. The AR Report won’t tell you everything you need to know. A lot is predicated on your patient mix. However, it will explain the metrics and give you some data by which to compare yourself and see if you are above, below or at the median. You will at least have an inkling whether you need to dig deeper or not.

#3 – Radiologists get end of month reports that aren’t worth the paper they are written on.

The average billing company provides pathetic reporting. I get sent these reports by radiologists who want me to evaluate their practice. These reports are so bad that I have a difficult time figuring out what is going on…and this is what I do every day.

I know one billing company that regularly provides over 100 pages per month in reporting. Who has the time or the energy to wade through all that stuff? In fact, let me suggest that this may be one of the strategies of the billing companies—bury them in BS. The RBMA came out with a 13 month standard report a while back with all the key metrics. This one piece of paper tells you all you need to know including key ratios. As long as you know what these key ratios and line items actually mean, you have a beautiful snapshot right there.

If you don’t know how to make heads or tails out of your end of month reporting, tell your billing company what you would like to see. If you don’t know what you need, give me a call. I’ll send you a sample of the RBMA report and even walk you through what the different things mean on the report and why they are important.

#4 – Radiologists focus too much on the billing fee.

Now, as the owner of a billing company, of course I don’t want groups to focus on the fee. But seriously, the fee is equal to one percentage point of net collections. If you go with a billing company that drops your fee by one point but loses you five points in net collections you are out a lot of money.

Case in point, one of my clients pays me one point more in fee than they paid their last billing company. However, we were able to raise their net collections six points, so they netted five points to the positive. Pretty shrewd business arrangement, I’d say. For the record, if there is anyone out there who I can give $1 to and they give me back $6, I am OK with that arrangement all day and all night.

The key is finding out who can bring home the bacon. How do you do that? References are a good start. Ask references what their net collection percentage was before the current billing company took over and what it is after. Another thing is ask them to guarantee their improved collections. My company guarantees we will improve collections in the first year or we will pay $10,000. At least you know we are serious and not just blowing smoke.

RBJ Article on Revenue Cycle Management

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

There is an old quote that says people don’t necessarily do what they are EXpected to do, they do what they are INspected to do.

In the December 2009 edition of the Radiology Business Journal, JulieRitzer Ross interviewed several practices on the metrics they used and the frequency in which they used them. One interviewee made a supposedly hyperbolic comment about measuring some things “minute by minute.” That sounds a little too intense if you ask me, but I do think that you need to keep an eye on a few key metrics.

Here’s my list from a billing perspective. On a daily basis look at your charges and payments. I compare them for each day of the month for the last year. For example, if it is the 15th of the month, compare that with where you were on the last twelve 15ths. On weekly basis, check your charges backlog and charges/payments by payer. On a monthly basis, I recommend the standard RBMA report with drill down capabilities.

To do all of this, you need to have the right billing system. You want this sort of thing at your fingertips because if it isn’t, you are probably not check things as thoroughly and as timely as you should. On my next blog, I’ll share with you some thoughts on selecting a billing system since I just went through the process.